Tuesday, April 29, 2008

To my shame, it’s been more than two weeks since I’ve posted a new entry here. I’ll try to not let that happen again.

During those two weeks, something happened which I think began germinating long ago with some Christians (I for one) making decisions based on the “need” for money. And since this happening could well have concluded with a murder or two, I consider it the stuff of Christian noir. Perhaps I’ll write about it sometime after the smoke clears.

For now, though, I want to clarify why noir fiction is valuable (for some of us necessary) reading.

Sara Vogan was a lovely woman, spirited and bright, whom I counted as one of my closest friends from my time in the U of Iowa Writers Workshop. After Iowa, when I was teaching at California State U, Chico, and Sara was living in San Francisco, I spent several weekends hanging out with her. We both loved blues, and spent good times at the S.F. Blues Festival.

Sara had a big heart, and was vulnerable to depression. And she never had enough money, a fact that conspired with other stuff to prompt or deepen her spells of depression.

She had sold film rights to her novel In Shelly’s Leg to Diane Keaton. Each year she received a small option and promises, which kept her from either taking or keeping good university teaching jobs. Her reason, or rationale, for turning them down or quitting them was location. She wanted to continue to live in San Francisco, which she considered an artistic and vital place.

But she couldn’t afford to live there, at least without poverty driving the depression deeper into her heart. She fought the depression with liquor and pills.

My friend Vicki called and told me that Sara had died. I don’t know if it was suicide or accidental overdose, but it was pills and liquor.

When I got off the phone with Vicki, I picked up a book, hoping to distract from my sorrow. The book was Charles Willeford’s Pickup. The main character is an alcoholic artist who refuses to leave San Francisco. That decision, among others, begins his descent toward perdition. I read it in one long night (which I never do), and came away feeling as if I understood Sara in ways I otherwise wouldn’t have.

I live in San Diego, and I know plenty folks who, like Sara, are in danger of getting killed by obsession with trying to live in such a “desirable place.” I told one of them just yesterday, Look, I love you, like I loved Sara, so get the hell out of here.

If I hadn’t read Pickup, I wouldn’t have understood. And maybe I wouldn’t have written The Do-Re-Mi.

Lot’s of readers insist that stories ought to have happy endings. At the risk of appearing maudlin, I’ll suggest that happy endings rarely teach us much. And to proceed through this treacherous world and help others do so, we’d best learn all we can. Such as the lesson of Bakker and Falwell, which I’ll write about one of these days, maybe soon.

Not that I agree with the philosopher Pascal that we should avoid stories with happy endings, but we also need doses of grim reality as warnings about what to avoid, and we learn best while being held captive by a great story.










2 comments:

Vicki said...

Ken--that was a sad memory. I had forgotten making that phone call to you. Maybe all suicide has an element of what you describe in it, that is people being unwilling to accept compromise or limitation in their lives. Or being willing to believe that joy can have many sources. Coming back to Riverside has proved that for me.

Bye for now. Vicki.

Donigan said...

It's about time! I've been checking this site a couple of times a day for weeks!

I remember this, with Sara.

Are you going to write about Jayne Anne?

Is this the Vicki from Tucson? The one Holly and I had the pleasure of sharing our Coronado hot tub with so many years ago?

I like reading your stuff, Ken, in spite of the profound differences in our inclinations, vis-a-vis superstitions.

Don